Rafael Tosetto vs Jakub Krawczyk Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Aug at 12:54 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Tosetto vs J. Krawczyk

BRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

POL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Tosetto 1 - 0 Krawczyk
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rafael Tosetto winning 2 and Jakub Krawczyk winning 0. The last match between Rafael Tosetto and Jakub Krawczyk was at the M15 Bielsko Biala, 13-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Rafael Tosetto getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tosetto | 1 |
| Krawczyk | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Bielsko Biala(08-13-25)
R. Tosetto vs J. Krawczyk H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.11% (92-88) | Career Total W/L | 22.50% (9-31) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Tosetto vs J. Krawczyk Match Preview:
- Second serve performance in recent months favors Krawczyk slightly, with a 42.31% success rate compared to Tosetto's 40.23%. Could this edge impact the match outcome?
- Tosetto shows strength in return games, winning 46.63% of opponents' second serve points and 27.87% of first serve returns, surpassing Krawczyk's 45.45% and 20% respectively. Does this indicate an advantage in breaking serves?
- Under pressure, Krawczyk excels, saving 71.43% of breakpoints, while Tosetto manages 48.25%. Could Krawczyk stay mentally resilient during crucial moments?
- Over the past year, Tosetto has a higher win ratio, claiming victory in 50% of matches, compared to Krawczyk's 22.22%. Will this experience advantage aid Tosetto?
- On clay surfaces where both perform best, Tosetto has a 50% win rate, which is significantly higher than Krawczyk's 31%. Could the clay surface sway the match in Tosetto's favor?
- Tosetto competes against lower-ranked opponents (average rank of 249.29) compared to Krawczyk (average rank of 130.19), possibly indicating tougher competition for Krawczyk. How might this influence their preparedness?
- Tosetto has won 40% of deciding sets in the last year, while Krawczyk has not won any. Is Tosetto better suited for extended match scenarios?
- In terms of break point conversion, Tosetto is more effective at 43.1%, compared to Krawczyk's 25%. Will this lead to more breaking opportunities?
Editorial Prediction (August 13, 2025, UTC):
Competitive strengths are evenly divided in some areas between Tosetto and Krawczyk, but Tosetto comes out on top in several performance metrics.
Tosetto's superior ability to convert break points and win return points could be crucial in shifting the match dynamics in their favor.
Krawczyk shows mental fortitude with competent breakpoint saving but struggles in deciding set scenarios and achieving wins.
With a clay surface likely playing a pivotal role, Tosetto's historical performance on this surface further strengthens their position as the favorite.
Based on current statistics and analysis, Tosetto is anticipated to emerge victorious in the upcoming tennis match.
Rafael Tosetto vs Jakub Krawczyk Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Tosetto vs J. Krawczyk H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:19:14 | Average Match Time | 1:19:14 |
| 60% (24/40) | 1st Serve % | 71% (41/58) |
| 88% (21/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (28/41) |
| 94% (15/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 24% (4/17) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (26/58) | Return Points Win % | 10% (4/40) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Tosetto Recent Matches Played
J. Krawczyk Recent Matches Played

R. Tosetto vs J. Krawczyk Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.11% (92/88) | YTD Win/Loss | 22.50% (9/31) |
| 53.06% (217/192) | Sets Win/Loss | 27.59% (24/63) |
| 51.11% (1941/1857) | Games Win/Loss | 39.74% (306/464) |
| 52.00% (26/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/8) |
| 50.77% (66/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 30.00% (9/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 345 | Aces Total | 8 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 229 | Total Double Faults | 20 |
| 1:7:37 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 270.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 153.13 |
| 63% (4544/7214) | 1st Serve % | 62% (228/366) |
| 66% (2989/4544) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (123/228) |
| 48% (1286/2670) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (52/138) |
| 44% (297/681) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (5/15) |
| 40% (2810/7092) | Return Points Win % | 30% (82/272) |
| 15.38% (2/11) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 53.89% (90/77) | Futures W/L | 23.08% (9/30) |
| 51% (91/179) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 23% (9/40) |
| 47% (20/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 32% (16/50) | Deciding Set Win % | 14% (1/7) |
| 81% (102/83) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (10/8) |
| 19% (102/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (10/2) |
| 10% (78/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 3% (30/1) |